PRINCE CASPIAN

Following the path of fantasy PRINCE CASPIAN is the second chapter in the series of THE CHRONICLES OF NARNIA written by C.S Lewis. The series is known for it’s magical stories interjected with Christian ideals. Director Andrew Adamson (who also directed THE LION, THE WITCH AND THE WARDROBE) explores the four children who are called back to NARNIA a year after their first adventure. They find that time in NARNIA has unraveled a more savage and treacherous adventure for them to deal with.

Considering I was skeptical about how much I would enjoy a children’s fantasy film, the first NARNIA movie left me quite entertained. I was actually looking forward to second as there was promise of a darker and more engaging storyline. I was disappointed.

The dialogue sounded out of place. Screenwriters need to be aware that some dialogue only fits the written word, not the spoken word. The screenplay felt like I was reading a book, as it was clear not much ‘adapting’ had been done. The actors were not natural in their skin.

I’m sure the plot was drawn close to the book, but there certainly seemed way too many scenes that did not allow character development. The villains’ evil presence seemed mismatched when they are head to head with the immaturity of the leading four heroes. Having battle scenes where the leads keep shouting “NARNIA” does not convey a BRAVEHEART moment. Despite the variety of sub-characters none were explored or developed. There needed more interactions that allowed depth. Even the darker moments of failure were simply brushed along. The romantic implications were not dealt with to play up emotion. It says alot when i was looking forward to the appearance of valiant mouse to keep me entertained.

The cinematography was one of the more successful elements of the movie. The locations were well suited to the story and the filming in it’s wide angles. It did have a grand view throughout.

I did not expect bad acting in a Hollywood blockbuster such as this, but that was one of the major downfalls. The young actors were in over their head, they could not keep any charisma on their on-screen counter parts. Their actions and emotions lacked any heart what so ever. Even during the moments of peril I was not conveyed the fear or frustration they felt. The only stand out performances were from a few indie actors (Peter Dinklage, Warwick Davis) and a still cute and adorable Lucy played by Gerogie Henley.

The director who is clearly satisfied with this success with of the first NARNIA film, felt he could do the same with this one. Rather than learn lessons from the more successful HARRY POTTER series, he did not leave room for the characters to mature with age. Despite being physical bigger there was no character growth. I was surprised at how many times i glanced at my watch hoping the end was near. The movie was quite boring and far too long.

Walt Disney has jumped on the ‘fantasy’ bandwagon as it is in fashion right now. Disney is trying to gain the same popularity of Warner Brothers HARRY POTTER series, and New Line Cinema’s LORD OF THE RINGS. But unlike the latter THE CHRONICLES OF NARNIA will need some ‘real’ magic to keep the interest of an on going fantasy series.

RATING: 2 COCONUTS

Pieries

TEASER